D800 vs MF Film, not a standard question

Started 7 months ago | Discussions thread
plasnu
Regular MemberPosts: 275
Like?
Re: D800 vs MF Film, not a standard question
In reply to fft81, 6 months ago

fft81 wrote:

I know there are numerous discussions as to which is better, film or digital and there is never an agreement; no matter how high the pixel count goes.

This thread is NOT about if d800 is better than medium format film.

My question is very simple:

I have d800, what should i expect if i try the MF or LF film photography?

For d800 i have to be allot more careful than i did with d90 to get pictures as good as camera can deliver; i suspect with MF/LF film my hassle will be even bigger. BUT, what do i have to gain in terms of DOF, color depth and overall clarity of the image later scanned to computer once i learn to use MF/LF film vs D800?

I am not interested in which one is better. I am not buying one vs the other. I already have D800. I am trying to decide if the gains from MF/LF film are big enough to go through the hassle of learning to shoot them.

Thanks ahead

I had the EXACT the same question as you before, and I got Mamiya 7ii and had been using it along with D800e. I do documentary and contemporary art. The reason I choose Mamiya 7 is it is one of the most popular camera for this genre of the photography. I bought D800e because I was not happy with the image quality of my portfolio, which are shot with various digital cameras.

D800e and Mamiya 7 are the completely different animal, although the size and weight is similar. I ended up selling D800e and went back to my little NEX7 (now I'm waiting for Fuji-XE1). I still have Mamiya 7ii, although I still have mixed feeling about it.

What I found using both cameras are:

1. There is probably very little difference between any current digital cameras in terms of IQ. The lens and post processing makes difference. I actually prefer NEX with Zeiss lens to D800 with Nikon 35mm. Carrying super heavy D800 makes no sense to me. It's impossible to me carrying both MAMIYA and D800 (about 5KG including bag) all the time. D800 is a better camera than NEX for AF, metering etc, but NEX doesn't have any problem with its AF and metering 95% of the time in the real world and it's way lighter than D800.

2. The print from Mamiya 7 has the quality that I was looking for. They do look real photography, instead of digital snapshots. They will certainly change the impression of my whole portfolio when I finish replacing all of the pictures.

3. It may sound stupid, but I feel like I'm a real photographer when I shoot with Mamiya. I feel more responsible for what I'm doing.

4. Mamiya is rangefinder, so it's much harder to compose. I'm not rich, so I can't shoot it like a digital camera. I think I have missed many good shots because I'm cheap.

5. Mamiya lens is not bright, so do not expect shallow DOF. If your main concern is shallow DOF, there is NO reason to use film nor MF camera. APS or FF digital camera and Zeiss lens does a great job. Just buy Zeiss lenses for Nikon. They should be excellent.

6. I don't have to explain the difference between the quality of film and digital, because if you can't tell it yourself, there is no reason to use film at all. Stick to digital and you'll be happy.

Edited 6 months ago by plasnu
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow