
19 hours ago
|
Re: Why 5DII better than 5DIII?
In reply to Thierry Legault,
5 months ago
|
Thierry Legault wrote:
The 5DII has a higher dynamic range than the 5DIII at low iso because of its lower read noise (dynamic range is directly proportional to read noise). My measurements gave, at 100 iso, 25 electrons for the 5DII and 34 electrons for the 5DIII (34 electrons too for the 1DX).
How do you explain the noticeable difference between your measurements and those of DxO?
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 months ago | 5 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 2 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago |