The "measured ISO" of the GH3: Surprise, surprise

Started 5 months ago | Discussion thread
Anders W
Forum ProPosts: 10,819
Like?
Re: Interesting finding and logical move by Panasonic
In reply to Amin Sabet, 5 months ago

Amin Sabet wrote:

Panasonic made a reasonable choice to expose to the right with the older sensors that had high read noise. This was especially useful with the GH1 that was susceptible to banding within pushed shadows.

With a sensor that has cleaner shadows, it makes sense that they are exposing a bit more to the left to allow more highlight headroom.

I agree that Panasonic did the right thing in their earlier cameras. But in what way does it make sense to change what they did on the basis of changes in sensor performance?

OOC jpeg shooters don't get one iota more headroom by lowering saturation in RAW. They only lose the ability to take full advantage of the quality of the sensor.

RAW shooters who know what they are doing don't gain anything either. They are not so badly hit as OOC jpeg shooters since they can compensate exposure properly once they are aware of how things work. Their only problem is that the OOC jpegs they have to rely on for in-camera review do not properly reflect sensor saturation.

The only ones who might benefit are RAW shooters who don't know how to handle highlight clipping properly, and therefore need a bit of hidden protection.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow