SX50 Mini-Review Take Three - SX50 (and SX40) When the Light Goes Down

Started 5 months ago | Discussion thread
VisionLight
Senior MemberPosts: 1,324
Like?
Re: SX50 Mini-Review Take Three - SX50 (and SX40) When the Light Goes Down
In reply to Augustin Man, 5 months ago

Augustin Man wrote:

In my opinion, yours are the BEST reviews/comparisons I've ever read! I think the entire forum community, regardless of the cameras they use, should be grateful to you, to the effort and the clear presentation you made. If I'd be a professional reviewer I'd learn your way of testing by heart! To the point, I've read in many reviews that "the 3.4 of SX50 vs. 2.7 of SX40 being an important drawback"; did they test it? No! The proof is your comparison!

If you allow me an outsider (beginner, amateur...) remark, I saw that the clock in the foreground was better rendered by SX50 at all speeds.

Augustin,

Like you, I spent part of my technology career designing and writing software. It sort of gives us a discipline to build and test details in an orderly manner that coalesce to fashion a useful product. Writing about technology and now about photography is very much the same process for me. Except with photography, besides the technical presentations, I also get to go out and enjoy the world in light and vision and try to capture some small part of its beauty. I do very much appreciate when these efforts become useful to others, so thank you.

I looked at taking the outdoor scene from in front of the clock. However I specifically moved back not only to provide a close counterpoint in the wide angle view but also, as you noticed, to see how much of the bright clock face would be rendered at each ISO. Yours is a good catch, Augustin, and I agree that the SX50 pulled it off much better.

Thanks again,

Vision

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow