
10 hours ago
|
Re: The cheapo effective 1,650 mm 5.6 tele (Q + adapter + Tamron 70-300 and other lenses)
In reply to Daniel Lauring,
6 months ago
|
Daniel Lauring wrote:
Isn't the diffraction limit, for the Q, actually about F2.5? That is where you start to lose resolution based on the formulas I've seen.
Over in Pentax Forums there's a recent thread that explores this subject. In theory, you are correct. On the other hand, in practice the best balance between resolution and sharpness was found to be around f/4 and f/5.6 depending on the lens tested.
An interesting read...
The OP is "hnikesch" ...worth the effort to find.
Cheers...M
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago |