Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
The cheapo effective 1,650 mm 5.6 tele (Q + adapter + Tamron 70-300 and other lenses)	Rosember	5 months ago
Re: The cheapo effective 1,650 mm 5.6 tele (Q + adapter + Tamron 70-300 and other lenses)	DAD519	5 months ago
Re: The cheapo effective 1,650 mm 5.6 tele (Q + adapter + Tamron 70-300 and other lenses)	mrschmo	5 months ago
Re: The cheapo effective 1,650 mm 5.6 tele (Q + adapter + Tamron 70-300 and other lenses)	Dale108	5 months ago
Re: The cheapo effective 1,650 mm 5.6 tele (Q + adapter + Tamron 70-300 and other lenses)	Rosember	5 months ago
Re: The cheapo effective 1,650 mm 5.6 tele (Q + adapter + Tamron 70-300 and other lenses)	ozdean	5 months ago
Re: The cheapo effective 1,650 mm 5.6 tele (Q + adapter + Tamron 70-300 and other lenses)	Rosember	5 months ago
Re: The cheapo effective 1,650 mm 5.6 tele (Q + adapter + Tamron 70-300 and other lenses)	mrschmo	5 months ago
Re: The cheapo effective 1,650 mm 5.6 tele (Q + adapter + Tamron 70-300 and other lenses)	Rosember	5 months ago
Re: The cheapo effective 1,650 mm 5.6 tele (Q + adapter + Tamron 70-300 and other lenses)	ozdean	5 months ago
Re: The cheapo effective 1,650 mm 5.6 tele (Q + adapter + Tamron 70-300 and other lenses)	Rosember	5 months ago
Re: The cheapo effective 1,650 mm 5.6 tele (Q + adapter + Tamron 70-300 and other lenses)	hcsekin	5 months ago
Re: The cheapo effective 1,650 mm 5.6 tele (Q + adapter + Tamron 70-300 and other lenses)	GeoffNS	5 months ago
Re: The cheapo effective 1,650 mm 5.6 tele (Q + adapter + Tamron 70-300 and other lenses)	John Cal	5 months ago
Re: The cheapo effective 1,650 mm 5.6 tele (Q + adapter + Tamron 70-300 and other lenses)	Rosember	5 months ago
Re: The cheapo effective 1,650 mm 5.6 tele (Q + adapter + Tamron 70-300 and other lenses)	Daniel Lauring	5 months ago
Re: The cheapo effective 1,650 mm 5.6 tele (Q + adapter + Tamron 70-300 and other lenses)	Rosember	5 months ago
Re: The cheapo effective 1,650 mm 5.6 tele (Q + adapter + Tamron 70-300 and other lenses)	Daniel Lauring	5 months ago
Re: The cheapo effective 1,650 mm 5.6 tele (Q + adapter + Tamron 70-300 and other lenses)	Daniel Lauring	5 months ago
Re: The cheapo effective 1,650 mm 5.6 tele (Q + adapter + Tamron 70-300 and other lenses)	Daniel Lauring	5 months ago
Re: The cheapo effective 1,650 mm 5.6 tele (Q + adapter + Tamron 70-300 and other lenses)	John Sheehy	5 months ago
Re: The cheapo effective 1,650 mm 5.6 tele (Q + adapter + Tamron 70-300 and other lenses)	13thBagel	5 months ago
Re: The cheapo effective 1,650 mm 5.6 tele (Q + adapter + Tamron 70-300 and other lenses)	John Sheehy	5 months ago
Re: The cheapo effective 1,650 mm 5.6 tele (Q + adapter + Tamron 70-300 and other lenses)	John Cal	5 months ago
Re: The cheapo effective 1,650 mm 5.6 tele (Q + adapter + Tamron 70-300 and other lenses)	Rosember	5 months ago
Re: The cheapo effective 1,650 mm 5.6 tele (Q + adapter + Tamron 70-300 and other lenses)	Jack Simpson	5 months ago
how much does the lens weight?	wyoming	5 months ago
Re: how much does the lens weight?	Rosember	5 months ago
Re: how much does the lens weight?	daveinla	5 months ago

Forum

Parent

First

Next unread

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

I see alot of mistakes in composition on this ...	94
Why are DSLRs left home 90.2% of the time	89
This is why to shoot in RAW	83
Does anybody shoot 16:9?	79
Nikon AF-S 85mm f/1.4 lens not so hot.	61
What's your favorite full frame walkaround lens?	52
NEX-6 or NEX-7?	49
* Wed C&C (No Theme) Thread, Ed. 265, 13 05 22 *	46
Did Nikon screw up?	44
E-P5 anyone?	40
Computer Screen sharp as an iPad Retina	38
Micro Four Thirds body deflation	38
Panasonic 14/2.5	36
OH MY GOD THE GX2 OH MY GOD	35
Why doesn't anyone like the GX-1?	32
Show us ONE of your recent favorite picture and...	30
Unlucky Me - Bad Nikon 17-35mm f/2.8D	29
R.I.P. Professional Photographers	28
Really Dumb camera can't take photos	28
Does DPreview waste your time, too?	27