For $450, Sony's 35/1.8 normal lens had better be a truly stellar performer...

Started Dec 4, 2012 | Discussions thread
Senior MemberPosts: 1,004Gear list
Re: 100% Wrong. Comparison is valid. Be schooled.
In reply to Scott McL, Dec 4, 2012

You are comparing apples to oranges. Like I said, they are many differences. Obviously Sony thinks they can charge that price and there's a market for it, so they've done just that. If you don't want to pay $450 for it, then don't pay $450 for it. Go buy a Sigma 30/2.8 on sale for $149.

 straylightrun's gear list:straylightrun's gear list
Sony Alpha 7S Sony E 16mm F2.8 Pancake Sony 85mm F2.8 SAM Tamron SP 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di USD Tamron SP 24-70mm F/2.8 Di VC USD +7 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow