For $450, Sony's 35/1.8 normal lens had better be a truly stellar performer...

Started Dec 4, 2012 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
straylightrun
straylightrun Senior Member • Posts: 1,269
Re: 100% Wrong. Comparison is valid. Be schooled.
3

You are comparing apples to oranges. Like I said, they are many differences. Obviously Sony thinks they can charge that price and there's a market for it, so they've done just that. If you don't want to pay $450 for it, then don't pay $450 for it. Go buy a Sigma 30/2.8 on sale for $149.

 straylightrun's gear list:straylightrun's gear list
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V Sony Alpha 7S Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Sony E 16mm F2.8 Pancake Sony 70-200mm F2.8 G +16 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
tko
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow