Interesting comparison of XE1 to the RX1 at iso 3200

Started Nov 30, 2012 | Discussions thread
57even
Senior MemberPosts: 7,096
Like?
Re: X-Pro 1 / X-Trans in-camera JPG compared to RX1 JPG
In reply to sroute, Dec 4, 2012

sroute wrote:

I won't cross post the entire post - details and images available here:

http://connect.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3344524#forum-post-50391184

Be sure to view the gallery link(s) to see the full size images 100% crops.

Curiousity killed the cat and a little more time - to make an apples to apples comparison, as best we can, I decided to look at in-camera JPGs only. I compared X-Pro1 and RX1 files, pitching the X-Pro1 ISO3200 file with "NR1" setting applied against the RX1 ISO3200 files with "NR0" and "NR1" applied.

Again, all are in-camera JPGs, which is precisely what NOLA JAMES was interested in. I should have done this sooner but my own interest is in the raw files of both.

There are sharpening halos on the Sony images and a lot of splotchy chroma noise on the grey background on the Sony images.

Again, these are not equalised. Zero NR for JPEGs can mean anything.

I am not expecting a 24MP FF sensor to be inferior, just that this proves absolutely nothing except that you don't understand what you are doing here.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow