Interesting comparison of XE1 to the RX1 at iso 3200

Started Nov 30, 2012 | Discussions thread
57even
Senior MemberPosts: 5,381Gear list
Like?
Re: X-Pro 1 / X-Trans in-camera JPG compared to RX1 JPG
In reply to sroute, Dec 4, 2012

sroute wrote:

I won't cross post the entire post - details and images available here:

http://connect.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3344524#forum-post-50391184

Be sure to view the gallery link(s) to see the full size images 100% crops.

Curiousity killed the cat and a little more time - to make an apples to apples comparison, as best we can, I decided to look at in-camera JPGs only. I compared X-Pro1 and RX1 files, pitching the X-Pro1 ISO3200 file with "NR1" setting applied against the RX1 ISO3200 files with "NR0" and "NR1" applied.

Again, all are in-camera JPGs, which is precisely what NOLA JAMES was interested in. I should have done this sooner but my own interest is in the raw files of both.

There are sharpening halos on the Sony images and a lot of splotchy chroma noise on the grey background on the Sony images.

Again, these are not equalised. Zero NR for JPEGs can mean anything.

I am not expecting a 24MP FF sensor to be inferior, just that this proves absolutely nothing except that you don't understand what you are doing here.

 57even's gear list:57even's gear list
Fujifilm X-Pro1 Nikon D800 Fujifilm X-E1
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow