For $450, Sony's 35/1.8 normal lens had better be a truly stellar performer...

Started Dec 4, 2012 | Discussions thread
Scott McL
Regular MemberPosts: 249
Like?
Thank you. That was the kind of information I was looking for.
In reply to Russell Evans, Dec 4, 2012

That's what I needed to know.

Indeed, edge-to-edge EX performance @f2 is worth money. So the answer turned out to be simple. It costs $450 because it is indeed a superior performing lens.

Thanks again for your thoughtful post.

- Scott

-- hide signature --

"Photography is not about the thing photographed. It is about how that thing looks photographed." - Garry Winogrand

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
.New
easyNew
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow