For $450, Sony's 35/1.8 normal lens had better be a truly stellar performer...

Started Dec 4, 2012 | Discussions thread
Scott McL
Regular MemberPosts: 249
Like?
Duh. Nikon's DX 35/1.8 AF-S DX "normal" only costs $195. Stupid sharp, fast focus, etc.
In reply to Scott McL, Dec 4, 2012

If folks can't generalize from one "normal lens" to another on a system camera, well, I wish you better luck in your future camera gear purchase decisions.

Question remains? What is Sony thinking? Are they counting on suckers for customers?

Or is Sony's 35/1.8 truly superior to the less expensive normal lenses on many other camera systems?

So far, no one has argued the last point - that Sony's lens is truly superior and thus worth the price.

Bad sign for all non-fan-boy prospective NEX system customers....

-- hide signature --

"Photography is not about the thing photographed. It is about how that thing looks photographed." - Garry Winogrand

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
.New
easyNew
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow