How many leave the Big Dog (D700/D800) at home while traveling and take a smaller camera instead?

Started 5 months ago | Discussion thread
shigzeo ?
Contributing MemberPosts: 623
Like?
Re: Take the D800
In reply to mgblack74, 5 months ago

mgblack74 wrote:

ARB1 wrote:

I'll be heading to Rome and Turkey and I just purchased a Think Tank Speed Demon (sweeeeet little bag by the way) and was JUST able to get my D800 w/24-120mm and OMD w/20mm and 45mm in there. But now I'm wondering if I really need my D800. I am far more familiar with my Nikon than my OMD and would probably miss having it for that reason, but I was wondering how many other folks go on long vacations and leave their big DSLR at home.

I guess the only reason I'm even considering this is because my wife and I walk/hike everywhere while on vacation and the weight is a bit cumbersome at times; although I did climb the mountains of Peru with this gear. And if I did leave it at home I'd probably purchase another MF3 lens to give me something on the long end like the Nikon 24-120mm.

But this is just a thought and I just wonder how many folks would miss their Dxxx if in this situation.

--
Allen
___________
"Easier to build strong children than to repair broken men."
-- Frederick Douglass

D800 is small and light vs integrated grip bodies. So I tend to take the D800. :-). If its a once in a blue moon trip, take the gear that gives the best IQ. D800 & 24-120 is all you would need. It gives you a 36-180 in 15mp DX mode too. That a pretty light "2 camera" set up.

--
"You're guaranteed to miss 100% of the shots you don't take" - Wayne Gretzky
_______________________________

Integrated grip bodies are things of the very modern past. They are brand new and built specifically for the sports shooter. They are too big. But so is the D800/D700/D300, which are much much larger/heavier than prior SLR cameras (barring the integrated F5 sort).

Comparing Nikon's modern SLR cameras to any from the 1970's when SLR's were light and small, is embarassing. Back then, deciding on an SLR and two good lenses was never a frustration. You took them and went. They were small, light, and easy to use. Today, the SLR alone weighs almost twice and is more than twice the thickness (except at the mount) of an FM/FE style camera which took the place of the D700 style versus the integrated grip cameras of today.

To the OP:
Unfortunately, I don't have a small dog camera, only the D200/800 and a host of AiS lenses (thank god for them as they are smallish). Apart from that, I have an FE and a Canon P rangefinder. I am hoping to be able to purchase a digital camera that hearkens back to the days of compact, high quality cameras, but none exists today except the Leica M series.

The Fuji X-Pro has a horrible viewfinder that is at best on par with a high-end point-shoot film camera. The X100 is decent, but the focus system isn't natural. There simply aren't good options now for people who shot SLR's back when they were small, who shot and enjoy film rangefinders unless they spend 7000$.

It's hard to want to invest in anything now except for work. Sadly, that's it, at least for shooters like me, who value good viewfinders and compact, high quality bodies.

flickr
O image - audio photography

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow