|
Re: The cheapo effective 1,650 mm 5.6 tele (Q + adapter + Tamron 70-300 and other lenses)
In reply to Rosember,
5 months ago
|
Thanks for taking these shots. I got my Q as a second body to take supertelephoto shots with my existing canon lenses. I tried one pic with my Tamron 55-200mm at f5.6 and 200mm and it was horrible. At first I thought it was the diffraction at 5.6 but after seeing your awesome 300mm pic, I think I must have just misfocused or shook the camera when I pressed the shutter. Anyway I can't wait to try again!
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago |