On the primacy of exposure

Started 5 months ago | Discussion thread
Mako2011
Forum ProPosts: 11,052
Like?
maybe
In reply to bobn2, 5 months ago

bobn2 wrote:

Mako2011 wrote:

bobn2 wrote:


Apart from the light level (which was more or less the same) there is nothing else to know, at least at normal shutter speeds (which this is).

Why then so soft? Motion blur (wind) or lens, or mirror slap? Just curious.

What has exposure to do with softness?

Not much really unless the exposure has forced a shutter speed or aperture (soft wide open maybe) that makes the image soft...as appears to be the case here.

In any case, the softness is to do with two things, the first is that no sharpening is applied in processing. The second is depth of field - find the bits in focus, they are quite sharp.

No they are very soft as presented as areas sharp in one pic are soft in another even at the center so I was wondering why.  The 6 pics very greatly so maybe that's why exposure does have a big impact (important to get it right) as it might result in changes in aperture and shutter speed far from optimal when under or overexposed. The loss in detail in the highlights is the thing I most notice.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow