On the primacy of exposure

Mako2011 wrote:

Again, how did you alter exposure in the original images? That plays into it greatly.

As far as the dif goes....pic 1, 2, and 6 show significantly more loss of detail in the highs than the other 3 (roof left center). 6 almost looks as if the shutter speed was to slow resulting in motion blur. At the other end the shadow noise in 2, 4 , and 5 seems significantly higher than the other 3. Light was indeed changing slightly. So I'll go with 1 and 6 being most overexposed (loss of detail in highs) and 5 being closest to optimal as it seems to retain the most detail overall. That was fun.