4:3, 3:2 or 16:9?

Started 5 months ago | Discussion thread
Florida Nature Photographer
Contributing MemberPosts: 884
Like?
Re: 4:3, 3:2 or 16:9?
In reply to bearshare, 5 months ago

I shoot at 3:2 because if I want I can always crop down to 16:9

If you shoot at 16:9 you cannot add the additional info at the top and bottom of the photo.

4:3 is taller thar 3:2 but not as wide

1:1 is the equivalent of 16:9. Except that you loose info that you cannot recover on the sides instead of the top and bottom. You can crop 4:3 down to 1:1

Of course, if you don't like to post process this would add another element to your decision.

--
Florida

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow