
|
Re: Low light AF
In reply to Barry Stewart,
6 months ago
|
Barry Stewart wrote:
Last poster says, "Auto focus is so much better in low light. (The E5 just totally smokes the 620 here)"
I've never touched an E-620 — but if the E-5 smokes the 620 in low light AF, the 620 must be an absolute dog.
My E-1 is far quicker than the E-5 in low light... because it has what no other Oly DSLR has: a focus assist beam. This is tremendously useful when using off-camera radio-slaved flash, or doing work where you don't want flash.
I should say, I only have the Mk1 14-54 & 40-150, ZD-50 and 50-200 SWD glass... but they are all useless in dim light on the E-5, unless I have my FL-50 to supply a focus assist beam. The 12-60 is purported to be great in dim light. I can't attest to that, though I have my doubts.
In good light, the E-5 is Oly's best in many ways. A complex beast, though... about like stepping out of a Camry and jumping into a Porsche.
Be sure that you need what the E-5 can give, as it is bulkier and heavier than the 620. You may enjoy the smaller form factor of the micro 4/3 cameras.
--
Barry
Hey Barry
Then the 620 is a dog! Not allot of experience here and have only had a handful of DSLR's. Namely the 500,620 and now the E5.
Putting focusing speed aside, yes my E5 does way - Way, better in low light when it comes to getting a focal lock
John
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago |