Is the FX revolution fizzling?

jfriend00 wrote:

Is it so hard to understand that long reach action shooters value the larger buffer, the higher-end AF system, the additional fps, the extra pixel density/reach of the D300 DX sensor and the pro-level ergonomics (in particularly, the ergonomics of the AF-ON button for me). Heck, I'd pay a LOT more for that.

A D600 is, plain and simple, just not optimized for long reach action. It's a compromise camera in pretty much all respects. If you're looking for the lowest cost way to get into FX, it's a perfect compromise for you. But, if you don't want to compromise buffer, AF, fps or reach, it's a very bad choice.