|
Re: Canon mg8220: Good enough for photos?
In reply to Mark McCormick,
6 months ago
|
Oooh, good idea on the cheap laser. Hadn't looked in so long, I didn't know they'd gone that low.
We very likely would use the scanning/copying features, so rather than a dedicated photo printer, a scanner, and a laser, I think we'll go with the laser/multifunction pair. Will report back on results. Loved our HP 7960, but it's gotten rather unreliable.
Thanks folks!
--
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago |