GH3 and EM5 ISO 3200 JPG test

Jorginho wrote:

I understand your response. In no way was I indirectly refering to you specifically. I am not like that, if I want to tell you something I am not going to talk to others about you in general.

It is okey that we disagree on some things and if you read some of my messages (well, there are quite a few so I understand you did not do that) I said that I will try to make some pics this weekend to see what ican show.

Now, if you want to do things scientifically we can go to several sites that would at least adress your needs. The dpreview site to my eyes clearly shows that OMd has better noise characteristics than GH2.

And Gh2 here is virtually identical to G5 (got that from DxO) mark.

DxOMark simply shows the sensors to be different. Noise about half a stop (not that much), DR anywhere between 0,5 and 1 stop. Tonality 1/3 to 1/2 a stop. Coloursensitivity 1.4 bits higher at base ISO and then evolving from wel over a stop to about 2/3 of stop better throughout the range. That is the purest and most scientific form we can get I think, as it measures the sensor characteristics. And not what you or I do with our tests....