Current 40D owner contemplating upgrade

qianp2k wrote:

Also Dave, aka Faintandfuzzy (not Fuzzyandfaint -;)), we know you are actually not interesting in any meaningful debates but mainly in namecalling and spoiling the threads. If you truly interest in debates, rather namecalling you should response with substances that you never have in all your posts. I remember clearly that in the past when you claimed your 7D can match to 5D2 IQ. You “processed” IR 5D2 and 7D ISO 3200 raw and picked up a least-detailed area thru your hands and then claimed you see there is no difference. It’s hilarious of your classic tactic. But when I disputed that and offered my own processed 5D2 RAW from IR sample and show entire original photo not just one tiny limited area, and show 5D2 photos are much better when compared to your processed 7D samples, you never responded but you can repeat your false and twisted claims over and over again in next 100 posts. It’s really wasting time for anyone trying to actually to dispute with you as you actually never intend into normal debates. You truly only resort to your empty mouth and keep saying something like ‘I am a 20+ yrs pro..you’re just a vacation snapper”. The funny thing is that we don’t see any pro but pure amateur level of photos in your website. Obviously from your website you don’t have many clients but just earned some pity money in taking photos of some neighbors and couples who cannot afford real pro. Gee, check those photos in your site, there are nothing to boast of, no skills and crappy IQ you can proud of. You only have very few photos each year so you’re obvious not busy in “fully booked” schedules as you claimed, so you have lots of free time trolling in DPR forums, pathetic

--
http://qianp2k.zenfolio.com/