
3 hours ago
|
Re: Why would I buy this lens over Tamron 70-200 f2.8 VC
In reply to inasir1971,
6 months ago
|
inasir1971 wrote:
m_appeal wrote:
assuming cost is the same or less for the Tamron
That's a good question and I'm wondering why so many are excited about this... I can see the appeal of a lighter package for hiking, but doesn't giving up the f/2.8 aperture reduce its capability of rendering nice bokeh for portraiture?
Here's a link with some Tamron 70-200 images + review (on a 5D3 though):
Expensive. Slow Glass. And not all that light or small.
People will buy it though.
Robert
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 2 | ||
| 6 months ago | 3 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | 1 | ||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago |