calibration results

i am calibrating an old samsung 22 inch tn monitor. The first time ive used calibration hardware. Im trying to find a report that gives me the best overview after using the spyder elite 4.

heres the problem, conflicting results between the spyders own software and that of the staandalone basiccolor. Using each to create a profile gives different results for the same target. Further while each software says their own profile calibrates to a decent accuracy validating the profile in the other software says the accuracy is poor. For example i set both a target of

temp: 6500
luminance 120
gamma 2.2
black level minimum

below are the reports from the 2 different softwares after suing the spyder software for calibration. While spyder says a reasonable delta average of just over 1 basiccolor shows a larger average and way higher maximum. How is it possible for the same profile to validate so differently?

spyder report

spyder

basiccolor reports

basiccolor

basiccolor