Light gathering in M43 vs FF

I'm amazed how many times this issue was raised on this forum: http://www.dpreview.com/search/forums?query=equivalence&forum=1041

And despite the clear answers on this forum, and even blogs about it (e.g. http://www.clarkvision.com/articles/does.pixel.size.matter/#The_f_ratio_Myth or http://www.stanmooreastro.com/f_ratio_myth.htm) there is still a lot of intellectually challenged people trying to prove the Earth is flat and the sensor size doesn't matter. Some of them trying to dodge the issue claiming that sensor technology matters more than size, so small sensor can always be made better than a large one. Which, of course, is nothing more than an effort to mislead the others. The sensor efficiency is very high nowadays and even if some sensors are technologically better, it's the photons that count! Surprise, surprise, the ideal sensors have noise too! Even an ideal m4/3 sensor can never approach today's FF sensors.