the 45mm doesn't provide shallow enough DoF... [image + shooting notes]

Started 6 months ago | Discussion thread
rkeller
Senior MemberPosts: 1,066
Like?
Re: Sure.
In reply to alatchin, 6 months ago

alatchin wrote:

So are you seeking the entertainment this time? I dont see any mention of FF until you bring it up.

Abraham

I think comparison to other systems is implied in my post. Then again, keeping fingers crossed this doesn't turn into another 'equivalence' battle.

For what I do, f/1.8 on 45mm m4/3 is plenty shallow. Even f/4.0 provides more than enough subject isolation many times.

--
"If you simplify your English, you are freed from the worst follies of orthodoxy. You cannot speak any of the necessary dialects, and when you make a stupid remark its stupidity will be obvious, even to yourself." - George Orwell "Politics and the English Language"
"Unfortunately, in digital photography a lot of people are seeing pixels, not photographs ... Everyone together now: it's not the pixels. Sing it with me." - Thom Hogan
"If you pick up a camera with any sort of serious intent, you will at least occasionally need to use a flash. Done deal. Lock solid, Take it to the bank." - Joe McNally

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow