Light gathering in M43 vs FF

Started 7 months ago | Discussions thread
eques
Senior MemberPosts: 1,192
Like?
Trying to make sense.
In reply to Dr_Jon, 7 months ago

Dr_Jon wrote:

Okay, didn't edit my quickie post in the 15 mins allowed, here's the version I was hoping to replace it with, where some typos and unclear bits were fixed...

It counts for exposure, but that's because ISO is not a constant but a variable between cameras. On m43 cameras (or any digital camera for that matter) the ISO settings are made so the exposures work out correctly allowing for the sensor performance.

This is true, but also applies to different mFT sensors: the E-M5 and GH2 give different exposure data at the same ISO setting. There are many variables to consider. We should assume identical sensors (except for size), identical processors, same lens parameters and construction, ... .

And ISO 50 on FF is not ISO 200 on mFT, if everything else is constant/identical.

The way to look at it is you get 1/4 the light on a m43 sensor over FF so they just turn up the gain at any ISO setting so the exposure is correct for that ISO.
The full-frame sensor in the example will have the same field of view but capture 4x the light.

The field of view doesn't have anything to do with the light level. The FF sensor has the same light level per mm² as the mFT sensor. See my post above.

The amplification in the camera will adjust it so ISO 200 needs the same exposure but you will have a lot more light, so all things being equal a lot less noise in dark shots.

This is due to another fact, but now I see what you want to say:
If you have an FF sensor and a mFT sensor with 16 MP each, obvously the pixels on the FF sensor are about 4 times as large as the pixels of the mFT sensor.
In consequence the noise level of an ISO 50 mFT photo is comparable to a ISO 200 FF photo, if everything else is constant/identical.

If you took a m43 sized crop from the FF sensor it would look similar to a m43 pic taken with the same focal length lens at the same exposure.
However that's not what happens, what happens is you take your photo and show it at a certain size, say on a 24" monitor. The FF shot captures 4x the light in that photo. Basically you can think of it as taking 4x the light and crushing it down to m43 size squeezing out the noise.

Sorry, this is quite obscure reasoning ...

Peter.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow