7 hours ago
|
Re: The Olympus 60 macro is no better than the Panasonic 45 2.8
In reply to ryan2007,
7 months ago
|
ryan2007 wrote:
IrishhAndy wrote:
ryan2007 wrote:
Why would it be. You still have to get in close for macro range to do 1:1. The only difference is focal length. Take the macro away and all you have are 2.8 prime lenses. The 60 mm does not focus as close as the Panasonic by about 2".
Macro lenxes are a waste of time.
It seems hooked on phonics was a waste of time. What is a "Lenxes", new lens species by chance. love it....
--
Without the darkness the light would be nothing !
I love it with tubes.
--
Without the darkness the light would be nothing !
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | 4 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 3 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 2 | ||
| 7 months ago | 5 | ||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | 7 | ||
| 7 months ago | 2 | ||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | 2 | ||
| 7 months ago | 8 | ||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | 4 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 8 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | 2 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | 2 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago |
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
