2 hours ago
|
Re: Not the Sigma...?
In reply to cpfrank,
7 months ago
|
cpfrank wrote:
I found that my Sigma 17-70 produced way better images than my 18-105 ( not the 16-85, but still Nikon ) not only in sharpness but colors as well. It also had macro to boot. Ended up selling the Nikon and keeping the Sigma. Curious as to why you have similar ranges with the Sigma and Nikon ?
--
Peyton
thnaks.
i sell the Sigma 17-70 to an used 16-85.. so i have to update my signature.
Thanks to everybody!
Max
--
D7000 + Sigma 17-70 OS HSM + Nikkor 70-300 VR + AF-S 35 1.8G + Yongnuo YN-467 + AF Macro Extension Tubes
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 months ago | 2 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 2 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago |
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
