Xtrans - OOC Jpegs - Raw - Oh My!

Started 6 months ago | Discussions thread
nixda
Contributing MemberPosts: 966
Like?
Re: Xtrans - OOC Jpegs - Raw - Oh My!
In reply to framus, 6 months ago

framus wrote:

nixda wrote:

framus wrote:

David,

Here's what I'm learning. The OOC Jpegs are more demanding of exposure and the various settings one can make (highlight/shadow tone, color level, film type). As a long time Raw shooter I'm finding I have to treat the Jpegs like I used to deal with slide film. The Raw files are more like negative film and more forgiving. Raw files have spoiled me. The in-camera raw conversion utility is excellent for exploring and learning the Jpeg variables.

I think this is the wrong way to look at it. the RAW files are not more forgiving than the JPEGs. Rather, the JPEGs represent a restriction compared to the RAW files. And that restriction is completely unnecessary. You captured the image properly if it can be rendered properly from the RAW file. If it can't be rendered properly starting with the JPEG file, but can be rendered properly starting with the RAW file, your technique is not at fault. After all, the data are fully there in the RAW file. There seems to be some mythical perception that, if one can't get a decent ooc-JPEG image one's technique must be flawed. Total nonsense.

I dont understand. Can you explain?

-Framus

Why do you think about RAW as 'more forgiving'? Why don't you think about JPEG as restricting instead? Why would you make the job harder for yourself by sticking with JPEG and the 'more demanding exposure and the various settings one can make', when that is a result of artificially confining yourself to an outdated format?

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow