Agree with Will Crockett

Allan Brown wrote:

The point of the discussion over this video and Will's review (if you can call it a review) is that he trashed the 100-300 because it is not as good as the Nikon 70-200.

I agree, however, the size could be a problem. This is where 4/3 would be a better choice.

Again, Will trashed both lenses for the wrong reason. The 100-300 is a good lens for the price and, with the Oly, is the only native option currently available. Could it be better? yes, but not at that price and size.

However, some are saying that the 100-300 is greatly improved with the electronic shutter of the G5 and GH3.

Allan