11 hours ago
|
Re: The Olympus 60 macro is no better than the Panasonic 45 2.8
In reply to Mikeywcu,
7 months ago
|
Mikeywcu wrote:
IrishhAndy wrote:
ryan2007 wrote:
Why would it be. You still have to get in close for macro range to do 1:1. The only difference is focal length. Take the macro away and all you have are 2.8 prime lenses. The 60 mm does not focus as close as the Panasonic by about 2".
Macro lenxes are a waste of time.
--
Without the darkness the light would be nothing !
Now there's a constructive comment!
Glad you liked it. Just get some tubes.
--
Without the darkness the light would be nothing !
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | 4 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 3 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 2 | ||
| 7 months ago | 5 | ||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | 7 | ||
| 7 months ago | 2 | ||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | 2 | ||
| 7 months ago | 8 | ||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | 4 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 8 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | 2 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | 2 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago |
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
