1
|
Re: 16mpx is ideal for video. You couldn't be more wrong...
In reply to Joseph S Wisniewski,
7 months ago
|
Joseph S Wisniewski wrote:
Again, your logic is flawed. Given equal levels of technology, more resolution directly equates to better image quality.
Seriously ?!
Here. -->
Canon C100 for $6500 at B&H with a 8.3 MP sensor optimized for video.
The optimized pixel count allows the camera to avoid additive processing as a result of skipping lines during capture; sensor sensitivity is maintained and aliasing or other degradation of the image is prevented.
http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/professional/products/professional_cameras/cinema_eos_cameras/eos_c100#Features
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 3 | ||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | 2 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 2 | ||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago |
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
