Could there be a downside to going from 16 to 24 Megapixels? No?

Started Nov 23, 2012 | Discussions thread
Photato
Senior MemberPosts: 1,810Gear list
Like?
Re: 16mpx is ideal for video. You couldn't be more wrong...
In reply to Joseph S Wisniewski, Nov 25, 2012

Joseph S Wisniewski wrote:

Again, your logic is flawed. Given equal levels of technology, more resolution directly equates to better image quality.

Seriously ?!

Here. -->

Canon C100 for  $6500 at B&H with a 8.3 MP sensor optimized for video.
The optimized pixel count allows the camera to avoid additive processing as a result of skipping lines during capture; sensor sensitivity is maintained and aliasing or other degradation of the image is prevented.
http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/professional/products/professional_cameras/cinema_eos_cameras/eos_c100#Features

 Photato's gear list:Photato's gear list
Canon IXUS 310 HS Canon EOS M Apple iPad Mini +1 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow