X-Trans RAW Support - Complain Where It Counts

Started 6 months ago | Discussion thread
nixda
Contributing MemberPosts: 962
Like?
Re: What would you do?
In reply to BillyInya, 6 months ago

BillyInya wrote:

Hi Nixda,

I hear what you are saying and while your %'s may or may not be a little far fetched your point is valid.

If raw processing software companies can not see the viability in putting in the effort to program in support for the X-Trans into their own software then that's their call. They have to make that decision. They may regret it, they may not. They may later program in support they may not.

It is 100% their call, not Fujifilm's. Blaming Fujifilm for any such decisions is laughable. This has been one of my points all along in exposing ratty's claims to be utter foolishness.

Cheers

Of course, it's Apple's, Adobe's, DxO's, etc. call to make their business decisions. But as it stands, X-Trans users want the software companies to make what by all measures must be considered a bad business decision. If Fuji wanted its users to have RAW support, they would do everything to turn that bad business decision into a good one. They are in the position to do so. But they haven't. To me it's a sign that Fuji doesn't care if some small portion of photographers can't get a decent workflow using X-Trans cameras. Thus, it's is really their fault when we (the small portion) are unsatisfied.

Regarding the 'far fetched' percentages: what do you estimate how many X-Trans users there are who want to do RAW processing, compared to the number of users of all other cameras out there who want to do RAW processing. I think 1:1000 is in fact too low, if anything.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow