
|
Re: It's NOT Fujifilm's Fault
In reply to BillyInya,
7 months ago
|
BillyInya wrote:
rattymouse wrote:
I dont know how you expect to win any arguments, nor impress others with your immense knowledge without any name calling. You are REALLY going to have to step up a lot more in the name calling if you want to have a prayer.
The claim:
Yes, I fall way short in the name calling department.
The reality:
BillyInya: "You and rattyclown have already stated it is Fujifilm's fault, "
BillyInya: "I dared to question this and have gone further by asking rattyclown to provide any facts..."
BillyInya: "I am happy to accept that I am wrong if you or rattyclown..."
BillyInya: "You and rattyclown talk the talk all right yet appear to crumble in a bumbling heap..."
Whereas you've got the name calling down to a fine art so I'll leave that to you.
Laughable.
I'm only interested in learning how it is all Fujifilm's fault and that "Fujifilm is to blame" that DxO and other software are not supporting the X-Pro1, as you claim in multiple posts. Like I've said before any facts or hard evidence would do it.
The truth of the matter is Fujifilm have NO SAY AT ALL about what cameras are or are not supported in the DxO raw processing software (as well as others). This is my position and it is one that I honestly find very difficult to believe you are trying to argue in the opposite.
But I am always open to learning so I invite you to back up your claims of the opposite with any hard evidence you have. It is a friendly challenge, you've got the opportunity to prove what you have claimed in a number of different posts now.
Show us some evidence that Fujifilm is to blame for no X-Pro1 support in the DxO Raw Processing software, just as one example. Can't be any more fair than that.
If you come up with hard evidence, any facts, that proves me wrong you will be the first to receive an apology. No problems.
I'm waiting.
Cheers
--
DISCLAIMER: The text written herein is meant to provide the opinions and/or suggestions of the author. No statement herein is meant to be considered law of the land, representative of any party or group, and or a quote from any party or group. Neither is any statement in the contained text meant to be taken as scripture, doctrine, or all encompassing of an entire populous or any groups or individuals therein.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 months ago | 9 | ||
| 7 months ago | 2 | ||
| 7 months ago | 4 | ||
| 7 months ago | 2 | ||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 2 | ||
| 7 months ago | 3 | ||
| 7 months ago | 7 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 4 | ||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | 3 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 2 | ||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | 2 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 4 | ||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | 2 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago |