|
Re: DXO - Nowhere Near Leading Edge Software
In reply to BillyInya,
6 months ago
|
BillyInya wrote:
Fujifilm can beg, grovel and plead with these RAW processing software houses but in the end it comes down to whether they want to build in support for the X-Pro1 in to their own software or not. It is as simple as that.
Where is there any evidence that Fuji has provided the information necessary for these companies to provide correct demosaicing? In fact, Adobe has stated publicly that Fuji did not provide *any* information about the X-Trans sensor either before or immediately after release. Many months later (late October 2012, if I recall correctly), there were rumors that Fuji and Adobe were finally working together on this, but we still haven't seen any results.
I think it's pretty clearly Fuji's responsibility to publish the specs if they want third-party software companies to support their proprietary sensor array. If Fuji doesn't release the specs, I fail to see how it's third-party companies' "fault" they do not properly support the sensor.
--
John Walker http://jhwalker.smugmug.com/
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months ago | 5 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | 2 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 2 | ||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | 2 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 2 | ||
| 6 months ago | 2 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 2 |