
|
Re: Can Very Top-end "Point and Shoots" Match CSCs in Image Quality
In reply to sjgcit,
7 months ago
|
sjgcit wrote:
Larger sensors give greater control over depth of field and lower noise than smaller ones.
P&S cameras have the advantage of a compact size that an interchangeable lens system cannot match when you add a lens.
Smaller sensor bridge cameras can have huge zoom ratios because the sensor is small and a larger sensor would require a larger lens which greatly increases cost, size and weight.
"Image Quality" is a rather silly terms which I hate, as the quality of the image is the photographer's job. When people use this term they tend to mean they're pixel peeping, which has no relevance to the quality of the image.
--
StephenG
I agree. As I have learned, increased size gives you greater versatility and better image quality for certain situations. Point and shoots offer pocketability over versatility.
For example, I just purchased the Canon S100 from Amazon for $229 as a lightning deal to accompany my Canon t4i DSLR. I have both for very different purposes. The t4i will take equivalent or better pictures than the S100 in all situations. The lenses that I have allow for great zoom range, great portraits, and many other quality shots not possible with a point and shoot. However the t4i is bulky, requires a big bag to carry all of my stuff, and I come across as "guy with big camera."
There are many situations where I don't want my camera visibile until I need it or I don't want to carry around a bulky DSLR. Examples include weddings, meals on the town with friends or fine dining situations, "active" vacation days such as theme parks, college football games, etc. During these times I just need a camera to capture momentos from the event. The S100 with a wrap case will fit in my pocket and will be there when I need a quality picture, but I don't want to have this huge camera on my hip or around my neck.
I just sold my Canon G11 because I no longer needed this "enthusiast" point and shoot. It was my main camera until I purchased my t4i. The G11 is quite large and requires a case to be on the shoulder to carry it around all day. While a nice camera, if I'm going to carry a camera too big for my pocket, I'm going with the t4i.
To make a point of all of this, ask yourself what you want the camera for. An interchangable lens camera will give beter image quality than a point and shoot and be less bulky than a DSLR. If I only had one camera, it would be some interchangeable lens camera like the Sony Nex 7. Since I want high quality shots from a variety of situations, I go with the DSLR over the interchangeable lens camera for the cost to performance ratio. Then I have the S100 which can fit comfortably inside my pocket when I need shots for momentos.
Hope this helps.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 |