We the People *NEED* Forum Moderation

Started 6 months ago | Discussion thread
Great Bustard
Forum ProPosts: 15,733
Like?
Re: I'm a huge fan of...
In reply to bobn2, 6 months ago

bobn2 wrote:

Great Bustard wrote:

bobn2 wrote:

Great Bustard wrote:

I once corrected a mod on a technical point on another forum, was banned, and sent the most nasty note with the ban. The fact that the mod was public made no difference, since the rebuke was private. In fact, because the mod was public, he took the correction as a personal assault on his "authority" and abused his power as a moderator to respond with the ban, which he may not have done if he were anonymous.

You forgot the second part of the story. Since you were banned and could no longer communicate with the mod, you asked me to pass on a message to him, which I did, with the result that I was banned too. So he also took an enquiry as to the reason for the ban as an assault on his authority, enough so to shoot the messenger.

Heh! I had forgotten about that!

Though maybe I should have read the message before passing it on.

Not my fault you forwarded that nude pic of me, which was for your own private pleasure, by mistake.

No, I posted that picture. Last thing I did before I got banned. The ban notice said 'are you trying to wind us up, posting pictures of a Ken doll on this porn forum'.

Hey, it was cold that day, and, well, Gregg wasn't there to do his job.

DPR moderation is not necessarily the worst, but any mod insecure enough to need to act in private isn't doing the job properly.

Like I've been saying, I think DPR's motivation is not nefarious, just cost-cutting. That is, there's no point in public moderation if public response is only to be ignored (indeed, it will just cause more resentment), so with public moderation necessarily comes answering for it, which I think DPR wants to avoid, for cost-cutting reasons.

I think it has its nefarious side. I just don't think they have put much thought into it, nor do they have much expertise in disciplinary systems. Too often the real reason behind bans is the mods irritability.

I think "the mods irritability" was much more an issue in the past than the present, and was based primarily on the number of complaints from various "motivated" individuals.  That's not to say that the mods were not given to overlook transgressions from one side, while focusing on the transgressions of another side -- the whole "evenhandedness" thing -- although even that, I feel, is a result of simple arithmetic.  That is, when a large group is constantly filing complaints against a smaller group, and the smaller group is not filing complaints, then rather than look into what is going on, just go by the numbers.

However, like I say, things are substantially better than they were, although, of course, things can be done for greater improvement.

In short, I don't think there is any nefarious agenda.  It's more like moderation is a burden.  Not dissimilar to how someone might see changing the engine oil regularly is too much of a burden only to find that the car breaks down more often resulting in a greater burden.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow