QUICK LINKS:VideosSample ImagesCamera TimelineLink Directory

connect.dpreview.com geasrshop.dpreview.com

News ReviewsBuying GuideSample Images Articles Cameras Lenses Printers Software Forums Galleries Challenges

Forum indexNikon DX SLR (D40-D90, D3000-D7000) TalkChange forum

Could there be a downside to going from 16 to 24 Megapixels? No?

Started 6 months ago | Discussion thread

hewhosculpts

Regular Member • Posts: 193

Like?

Re: Could there be a downside to going from 16 to 24 Megapixels? No?

In reply to river251, 6 months ago

There is no real downside but if you really want to utilize all the resolution that the D3200 has to offer then you have to use the sharpest lenses available and stay under F4 unless you want diffraction to start to blur the shots.

Reply Reply with quote Complain

Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
Could there be a downside to going from 16 to 24 Megapixels? No?	river251	6 months ago
Any purpose in paying for 24Mp ?	sjgcit	6 months ago	3
Re: Could there be a downside to going from 16 to 24 Megapixels? No?	mgd43	6 months ago	1
Re: Could there be a downside to going from 16 to 24 Megapixels? No?	hewhosculpts	6 months ago
Re: Could there be a downside to going from 16 to 24 Megapixels? No?	river251	6 months ago
Re: Could there be a downside to going from 16 to 24 Megapixels? No?	evan47	6 months ago
Re: Could there be a downside to going from 16 to 24 Megapixels? No?	John E Fox	6 months ago
Re: Could there be a downside to going from 16 to 24 Megapixels? No?	river251	6 months ago
Re: Could there be a downside to going from 16 to 24 Megapixels? No?	John E Fox	6 months ago
Re: Could there be a downside to going from 16 to 24 Megapixels? No?	river251	6 months ago
Re: Could there be a downside to going from 16 to 24 Megapixels? No?	river251	6 months ago
Re: Could there be a downside to going from 16 to 24 Megapixels? No?	Kerry Pierce	6 months ago
Re: Could there be a downside to going from 16 to 24 Megapixels? No?	river251	6 months ago
Re: Could there be a downside to going from 16 to 24 Megapixels? No?	toomanycanons	6 months ago
Re: Could there be a downside to going from 16 to 24 Megapixels? No?	Theodoros Fotometria	6 months ago
16mpx is ideal for video. You couldn't be more wrong...	Joseph S Wisniewski	6 months ago	1
Re: 16mpx is ideal for video. You couldn't be more wrong...	Photato	6 months ago	1
I said "Given equal levels of technology"	Joseph S Wisniewski	6 months ago	2
Re: I said "Given equal levels of technology"	Theodoros Fotometria	6 months ago
Re: I said "Given equal levels of technology"	Kerry Pierce	6 months ago	2
Still comes down to equal levels of technology, and convergence	Joseph S Wisniewski	6 months ago	1
Re: Still comes down to equal levels of technology, and convergence	Kerry Pierce	6 months ago
Re: 16mpx is ideal for video. You couldn't be more wrong...	Theodoros Fotometria	6 months ago
Re: Could there be a downside to going from 16 to 24 Megapixels? No?	VidJa	6 months ago
Re: Could there be a downside to going from 16 to 24 Megapixels? No?	Theodoros Fotometria	6 months ago

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

About us Write for us FAQ Feedback Interest-Based Ads Privacy Legal

All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998 - 2013 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.

Mobile site