|
Re: DXO's Pentax K-5II Review
In reply to rrccad,
6 months ago
|
rrccad wrote:
Emacs23 wrote:
I wish DxO to remove their general score as quite senseless. On the other hand, I really enjoyed the K-5's output with their fantastic implementation of Sony IMX071 unit, much better than the same unit of NEX-5n.
however, I do wonder how much that is due to the fact that canon does have a rather high black point offset. of which 50% of that data doesn't even exist in nikon land for instance - rendering shadow pulling at the minimum twice as difficult.
Hi rrccad,
Could you explain a bit more on this paragraph? what data doesn't exist in nikon land?
Thanks!
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 3 | ||
| 6 months ago | 3 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago |
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
