Xeon quad-core 2.66 for photo and video editing?

Started 7 months ago | Discussion thread
motion
Contributing MemberPosts: 577
Like?
Re: I would not do it. Because...
In reply to Robert Peters, 6 months ago

Robert Peters wrote:

After purchasing a Nikon D800 I hit a massive performance wall with my MacPro (2 x 2.66 GHz Dual-Core Intel Xeon).

I purchased the latest version of a 3.33GHz, 6-core MacPro and increased the memory to 16 GB. Unsatisfactory result: I got a factor of 2(!) decrease in rendering time for $3000. That was unacceptable so I returned the MacPro to Apple.

Is this typical of a Mac Pro? In another thread he mentions that this is even with an SSD installed.

I'm just about to buy a second hand 2.66GHz 4-core 2009 Mac Pro, but reading the above scares me. I understand however (from reading the Mac Performance Guide) that a lot can be done regarding speed increases with HDD RAID-0 configurations, SSDs (for boot and scratch disks) as well as sufficient RAM.

Please do assure me someone that I'm not making a silly choice about investing in a Mac Pro (and not even the current model)

Edited 6 months ago by motion
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow