Stick with Nex or Head Back to Micro Four Thirds

Started 6 months ago | Discussion thread
Rehabdoc
Contributing MemberPosts: 587
Like?
Re: You can't compare at equal ISO
In reply to m_appeal, 6 months ago

m_appeal wrote:


The OMD ISO settings are unusually inaccurate, being a full stop low. eg., ISO1600 is really only ISO800. This is apparent in the dpreview test shots as well as the DxO tests.

So if you think they're about equal at equal ISO settings, that means the NEX 7 actually wins by a stop (it actually doesn't win by a full stop--more like 1/2 to 3/4--but it's noticeable if you're looking closely).

Bart

--
http://bhimages.zenfolio.com

How do you know that OMD ISO is inaccurate? Have to admit it's hard to judge anything from these comparisons though, since they are not done well.

What? I had heard that Fuji fudged their ISO numbers to inflate their low light performance on XPro 1. Had not heard that Olympus did that with OMD EM5.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow