Stick with Nex or Head Back to Micro Four Thirds

Started 6 months ago | Discussion thread
m_appeal
Senior MemberPosts: 3,434
Like?
Re: Stick with Nex or Head Back to Micro Four Thirds
In reply to spacemn, 6 months ago

Disclaimer: Don't own either but from what I've seen and read here and elsewhere, people who have tried both say that om-d is a bit better than nex 7 and on par with 5n when it comes to high iso.

Here is one comparison giving the e-m5 the edge over nex 7... certainly not to say it's right, but it's really not the first time I've read it, so I'm inclined to believe it

http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Olympus_OM-D_E-M5/Olympus_E-M5_vs_Sony_NEX-7_vs_Nikon_D3200_noise_RAW.shtml

spacemn wrote:

m_appeal wrote:

the om-d e-m5 is on par with 5n in low light. However the 5n would have better dynamic range...

m_appeal wrote:

the om-d e-m5 is on par with 5n in low light. However the 5n would have better dynamic range...

What makes you say that?

From a quantitative test perspective the 5N has better low light performance and so does NEX-7 (c.f. DXOMark).

Edited 6 months ago by m_appeal
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow