|
Only noticeably smaller in length...
In reply to joharis,
6 months ago
|
joharis wrote:.
The first film OM-1 was the smallest of the OM series and in that time the smallest film SLR. Dimensions were 136x83x81mm.
Dimensions of the OM-D are 122x89x43mm. So it's 14mm smaller, only 6mm higher and has nearly half the thickness. I think you can not say that the OM-D is normal SLR sized, it's really noticeably smaller.
122-89-43 Olympus E-M5i
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months ago | 4 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 3 | ||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 2 | ||
| 6 months ago | 2 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 2 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago |