3 hours ago
|
Re: It's NORMAL SLR sized????
In reply to joharis,
7 months ago
|
joharis wrote:
Mike_PEAT wrote:
If you compare the size of the OM-D with past OM film SLRs you'd see the OM-D is quite similar in size.
The first film OM-1 was the smallest of the OM series and in that time the smallest film SLR. Dimensions were 136x83x81mm.
Dimensions of the OM-D are 122x89x43mm. So it's 14mm smaller, only 6mm higher and has nearly half the thickness. I think you can not say that the OM-D is normal SLR sized, it's really noticeably smaller.
What? Did you measure the OM-1 with the lens on?
The E-M5 is indeed only a little bit smaller than the OM-1 and for someone who has used the mechanical marvel since the 70's it fits right into the hand.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 months ago | 4 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 3 | ||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 2 | ||
| 7 months ago | 2 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 2 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago |
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
