OM-D too small?

Started 6 months ago | Discussion thread
joharis
Regular MemberPosts: 413
Like?
Re: It's NORMAL SLR sized????
In reply to Mike_PEAT, 6 months ago

Mike_PEAT wrote:

If you compare the size of the OM-D with past OM film SLRs you'd see the OM-D is quite similar in size.

The first film OM-1 was the smallest of the OM series and in that time the smallest film SLR. Dimensions were 136x83x81mm.

Dimensions of the OM-D are 122x89x43mm. So it's 14mm smaller, only 6mm higher and has nearly half the thickness. I think you can not say that the OM-D is normal SLR sized, it's really noticeably smaller.

--
http://www.flickr.com/photos/joharis/

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow