Hi. Can u pls suggest Nikon's D5200 would be a better choise compare with D5100.

Reilly Diefenbach wrote:

My goodness, what a major flood of misinformation we have here!

The difference between a D800 shot and a D5100 one is clearly visible on any decent monitor or at 8X10. If you can't see it, it's time for a new 1080p monitor or a new pair of glasses. Just around the corner are 4K monitors which will show the spread even more clearly. We all thought VGA resolution was hot stuff and that there was no need for more than 2MP. The difference between the D5100 and the D5200 is less blatantly obvious, but it is definitely there for those not blinded by loyalty to their purchase. It is not necessary at all to have an SSD drive or some overclocked monstrosity of a computer to work on D800 files, let alone a 24MP cam. Where on earth are you getting that from? An i5 laptop will do just fine. Terrabyte drives are available for a pittance.

As I said earlier, 16MP is as extinct as the dodo, never to be seen again in any new DX model.