If I could place the RX100 sensor in A500 for bird shooting, .........

Started Nov 18, 2012 | Discussions thread
Draek
Senior MemberPosts: 2,028Gear list
Like?
Re: To all who think that aperture equivalence is irrelevant
In reply to Allan Olesen, Nov 20, 2012

Allan Olesen wrote:

It is relevant because the total amount of light gathered is the single property which explains almost all differences in noise in the full image when you compare modern cameras. So this is actually the reasoning behind my claim #3.

For a pretty damn narrow definition of "modern". For instance, switching to an improved sensor alone made Olympus jump forward in 0.65EV between the E-PL3 and the E-PL5, and even against contemporary Panasonic cameras there's an improvement of around half a stop.

Haven't run the numbers in other segments, but I suspect your data happened to be well correlated by pure chance and that we'd see similar variance in other sensor sizes given enough samples. Except for 1" of course since, you know, there ain't any.

 Draek's gear list:Draek's gear list
Fujifilm FinePix F70EXR Samsung TL500 Canon PowerShot A1200 Sony Alpha DSLR-A390
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow