D800: what's the point?

Started 7 months ago | Discussions thread
5tve
Contributing MemberPosts: 623
Like?
Re: take up the cudgels for the OP
In reply to gl2k, 7 months ago

gl2k wrote:

The main problem with the OPs post is the way he expressed himself. Other than that he has a point. I made a similar statement some time ago.

RESIZING ... there is a common opinion that one has to resize images to properly compare them. Nonsense. As a D800 and D300 owner I can say ... reduced to screen size at ISO 100 the images of both cams are hard to tell apart. Does this make both cams equally good ?

That said the OP is right ... if it's not for all the additional features of the D800 the D600 is definitely the more cost effective choice for many amateurs.

Seems to me that the overreaction of some members here is their injured pride. OMG ... a lesser body gives equal images compared to Nikons 36mpx dream machine. C'mon on guys ... a bit childish, isn't it ?

When you resize the D800 image to the same size as an image from a lower resolution camera you get a sharper  image with more detail.

I downloaded the  DPR 12800 raws for the D600 & D800

The D800 was much darker exposure time was only 1/2000 compared to the D600 at 1/1600.

I increased exposure for the D800 by  a 1/3 rd of a stop to compensate & downsized to match the D600.

The only noise reduction was in lightroom for colour which I left at the default.

I used the highpass filter to sharpen using the soft light blend mode.

D600

D800

D600 ISO 12800 exposure 1/1600

D800 ISO 12800 exposure 1/2000


Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow