Nikon 200-400 f/4 vs Nikon 300 f/2.8? Better option?

Started Nov 12, 2012 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Contributing MemberPosts: 586Gear list
One other distinguishing characteristic between the two lenses...
In reply to wasserball, Nov 18, 2012

I have both the 300 vrII and the 200-400 VRI. Both are spectacular lenses, used on a D300, D700, D800 and D4. But I do a lot of bird in flight photography. I have tried to use the 200-400 for this for several years, but with limited success. I find that I can not smoothly follow the BIFs as well with the 200-400 as I can with the 300 or 300+1.4X. The 300 is enough shorter and lighter to make my BIF success rate much better. The 200-400 is a bit longer and heavier in the front. It makes fine tuning the speed of my pans with the flying birds more difficult.

One great strength of the 200-400 is its close focusing ability. A very useful feature.

PS_ I wish Nikon had something like the Canon 400 5.6.

 mikew's gear list:mikew's gear list
Nikon D4 Nikon D800 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 600mm f/4G ED VR Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm f/1.4G Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II +10 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow