|
Original.
In reply to Gnagno,
6 months ago
|
Gnagno wrote:
I have a 5n, and i would like to buy a sel 18-200. But, which one? The "le" version would fit better the small body, but I've never seen a comparison with the old one, which is surely a great lens. I'm more interested in image quality. Slrgear test show that the "le" isn't good as the old one, but, of course, a real test could demostrate that the difference is not so big. thanks in advance. Luca.
I have the original 18-200 and love it. It's by far the best all-in-one lens I've ever used from any manufacturer. To me the 1/4" in size difference is not an issue (but I shoot with a NEX7, which is obviously bigger than the 5n). My 18-200 has no zoom creep whatsoever. I just looked up the price difference between the two Sony's and saw only $50 difference. IMO, the original 18-200 is a no brainer - $50 bucks for better IQ and build while only being 1/4" bigger and 2 oz heavier.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/732292-REG/Sony_SEL18200_DT_18_200mm_f_3_5_6_3_Zoom.html
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/863264-REG/Sony_SEL_18200LE_18_200mm_f_3_5_6_3_OSS_Lens.html

Just an example taken with my 18-200. F8, JPG, 0 PP. And there's nothing wrong optically with the image. And this just a typical shot, not even one of my "good ones". You can't go wrong with the Original SEL18-200 OSS.
--
NHT
while ( ! ( succeed = try() ) );
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago |