The RAW vs JPEG debate

Started Nov 17, 2012 | Discussions thread
seilerbird666
Senior MemberPosts: 1,101
Like?
Re: To ANYONE with a SLT which is NOT a A99...
In reply to NPPhoto, Nov 18, 2012

NPPhoto wrote:

Please put this RAW vs. JPG debate in perspective. I think RAW starts losing its benefits when noise starts to become a factor. I get more from my RAW files under ISO 800 but anything 1600 or over, noise starts to become an issue. Then, if I apply NR even in LR4, I lose details.

This could be my error or lack of proper LR4 knowledge but can someone please post ISO 1600+ in low lighting to show us how RAW is better than jpg?

-- hide signature --

Nick P



How about one that is 3200 ISO?

-- hide signature --

My photos:
picasaweb.google.com/seilerbird

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Huh?New
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow